Environmental effects of seaweed aquaculture-Factsheet

Exploring seaweed aquaculture's impacts in Aotearoa New Zealand, comparing it to mussel farming, and proposing environment-focused management.

Open document

Contextual overview

Seaweed aquaculture represents a nascent industry within Aotearoa New Zealand, with existing green-lipped mussel growers showing an increased inclination towards incorporating seaweed into their aquaculture practices. Comparing the environmental impacts of both seaweed and mussel aquaculture is essential for understanding potential effects and guiding future management decisions. As seaweed aquaculture shares cultivation methods with the more established mussel operations, it provides a familiar framework for analysis. However, the cultivation of specific seaweed species remains variable, underscoring the need for ongoing research to fine-tune environmental assessments and management strategies.

Detailed environmental impact analysis

In terms of benthic impacts, mussel aquaculture may lead to sediment alteration due to the presence of shells and wastes, thereby increasing organic content and modifying sediment composition. Conversely, seaweed farms are perceived to exert comparatively less pressure on the benthic environment despite the shedding of tissues during growth. The shading of primary producers is another factor, with seaweed having the potential to impact more significantly than mussel farms. Mussel aquaculture can affect plankton abundance due to filter feeding, possibly improving water quality but impacting the food web, whereas seaweeds may absorb dissolved nutrients assisting in water purification but limiting nutrients for other marine life. Key management considerations for seaweed aquaculture include avoiding sensitive habitats, responsible sourcing of species and seedstock to reduce genetic impact, and designing farms to minimise wildlife entanglement risks.

Conclusions and future recommendations

Given existing knowledge, the environmental effects of seaweed aquaculture are likely comparable or smaller in scale than those of mussel aquaculture. Provided a mussel farm's environmental impact has been deemed acceptable, similar settings could accommodate seaweed farming. Nevertheless, uncertainties exist due to the industry's infancy, underscoring the importance of ongoing research. Future directions should focus on increasing studies to better understand environmental effects and developing comprehensive environmental management plans specific to seaweed aquaculture. While potential challenges such as genetic dispersion and wildlife entanglement present concern, adherence to suggested mitigation strategies offers a path to responsible industry growth.

Key insights
01
Benthic environments experience less impact from seaweed farms

Analysing the environmental effects indicates that seaweed farming's influence on seabed ecosystems is less significant than that associated with mussel farming. This finding highlights the potential for seaweed aquaculture to expand with reduced ecological footprints.

02
Careful site and species selection can mitigate genetic impact

The use of locally sourced broodstock for seaweed farming minimises the risk of genetic contamination. This strategy is pivotal in maintaining the genetic integrity of wild populations and promoting ecological sustainability within the burgeoning industry.

03
Implementing proper layout and design reduces wildlife risks

Designing seaweed farms with a focus on minimising entanglement risks for marine wildlife reflects a commitment to ethical and environmentally sensitive practices. This approach will be central to the industry's responsible development and public acceptance.

Related research documents:

Title and summary

Knowledge guiding change.

Links
Our workstreams
Case studies
Resources

© Copyright 2024 - Tohorā

logo